Written collaboratively by Emmanuel Byamukama, Dalitso Yabwalo and Rick Geppert.
Several soybean acres are routinely treated with fungicides in South Dakota. According to a USDA 2012 report, over 25% of soybean acres were treated with a fungicide in the state. A number of producers ask whether there is a return on investment with fungicide application on soybeans. Increased yields from fungicide application depends on the level of disease severity. How much disease severity develops depends on the environment mainly moisture and temperature but also on cultural practices like crop rotation, tillage, and susceptibility of the cultivar planted.
2015 Foliar Fungicide Trials
The SDSU Extension Plant Pathology program conducted foliar fungicide trials sponsored by the South Dakota Soybean Research and Promotion Council to determine the increase in soybean yields as a result of fungicide application. The trials were planted at the SDSU Southeast Research Farm, Beresford (May 28, 2015) and at the Volga Research Farm (June 2, 2015). Plot size used was 5 ft x 15 ft and row spacing 30 inches. Six commonly applied foliar fungicides in soybeans in South Dakota were used in this study (Table 1). The fungicides were applied at R3 (beginning pod) growth stage. Plots were assessed for disease severity (% plot disease severity on the upper canopy) 28 days after fungicide application.
|Fig. 1. Some of the common soybean foliar fungal diseases in South Dakota (a) Brown spot/Septoria, (b) Cercospora leaf spot.|
We saw very low foliar disease pressure in soybeans at both locations. Yield data showed no statistical difference within fungicides and also when compared with non-treated plots (Table 1). The lack of statistical difference indicates that the numerical difference between fungicides and non-treated plots can be attributed to chance. This is not surprising given that there was such low disease pressure at both test locations. We did notice, however, at the Volga location where there was some disease presence, that all fungicide treated plots had significantly lower disease severity compared to non-treated plots.
Table 1. Disease severity and yield for different fungicides applied at beginning flowering at two locations 2015.
|Plot diseasea severity (%)||Yield
|Plot disease severity (%)||Yield
|Untreated||2.5 a||61.98 a||0 a||75.23 a|
|Stratego YLD||4||0.4 b||66.97 a||0 a||77.06 a|
|Priaxor||4||0.2 b||66.62 a||0 a||81.8 a|
|Quilt Xcel||10.5||1 b||64.53 a||0 a||75.54 a|
|Aproach Prima||4||0.7 b||66.75 a||0 a||76.77 a|
|Quadris Top||8||0.4 b||67.27 a||0 a||78.97 a|
|Fortix||4||0.7 b||65.49 a||0 a||79.88 a|
|a Means followed by the same letter in a column are not statistically different from each other at 10% probability level.|
The 2015 foliar fungicide trial results are not different from previous years’ data or data from other universities in the region. Yield increase from applying fungicides in soybean is dependent on the level of disease severity. This should be the overriding factor when deciding whether to apply fungicides in soybeans. Conditions that favor fungal diseases to develop include wet and warm weather especially around R1 (flower primordia), susceptibility of the cultivar planted, field conditions such as soybean following soybeans, and no-till or conservation tillage. Scouting soybeans at R1 should indicate the amount of disease developing and a fungicide is justified when leaf diseases (such as brown spot, Cercospora leaf spot, downy mildew, and frogeye leaf spot) can be observed on every plant at 5% severity in the middle canopy.
Since conditions vary from field to field producers are encouraged to setup test strips of treated and non-treated foliar fungicide in their fields to determine if fungicides would be beneficial. Producers interested in setting up fungicide strip trials can contact the SDSU Extension Plant Pathology program at 605.688.4521 or Emmanuel Byamukama for assistance.